Linkspam, 5/17/13 Edition

Strongylodon macrobotrys  Andrew Zuckerman :: flowerthebook.com

Strongylodon macrobotrys
Andrew Zuckerman :: flowerthebook.com

Finally but certainly not least: this was Donna’s last week as a regular here at the Radish. I am going miss her posts and I know I’m not alone. I couldn’t have asked for a better partner than Donna in this particular endeavor. And thus, for her, a lighthouse. She knows why.

Sunday Linkspam: Special Edition!

Girl's Hair-Do Reveals Love Life

Girl’s Hair-Do Reveals Love Life: A signal and a challenge.

Due to massive link overload, this week’s linkspam had to be broken into two posts! Enjoy!

As with Friday’s post, thanks again to Jessica for her assistance in collecting these links. Much appreciated!

Linkspam, 5/10/13 Edition

First, many thanks to Jessica for her wonderful guest post yesterday as well as her contributions to this week’s linkspam!

Second, we have so many links this week that I’ve had to break this into two posts–one for today and one that will post at some point during the weekend.

Linkspam, 5/3/13 Edition

Static, Alex Hall

Static, Alex Hall

Also, I realized that there’s a huge hole in my reading.

How to Suppress Women's Writing, Joanna Russ

How to Suppress Women’s Writing, Joanna Russ

That and Terry Tempest Williams’s When Women Were Birds should make for stimulating weekend reading.

Linkspam, 4/12/13 Edition

Alive Without Breath: Keng Lye

Alive Without Breath: Keng Lye
These are amazing and gorgeous and I want one.

Linkspam, 3/8/13 Edition

I was given a tip to a delightful little piece of fan fiction that does an incredible job of uniting mathematics with relationship angst in a way I didn’t think was possible but instead of linking it, I’m just going to quote my favorite bit from it and y’all can do the rest: “He didn’t understand the thrill of being a polymath, the new worlds that were opening up to me.”

Linkspam, 3/1/13 Edition

Threeasfour Fall 2013

Threeasfour Fall 2013, or: Always Match Your Lipstick to Your Dress. ALWAYS.

Finally, the last link this week is going to lead into some commentary on my part because I Have Opinions: Social Media and Review Crews: A Q&A with Susan Mallery.

The post describes a program wherein an author, Mallery, has a box of 200 books from her publisher. She decides to put together a “Review Crew” of people who will get the book, write a review of it somewhere and by doing so get themselves an advance copy of her next book–which they will also have an obligation to review somewhere. They apparently had thousands of people interested in doing this.

The purpose of this is to deliberately manipulate the rankings at Amazon and Barnes & Noble–Mallery comes right out and says this. I get that publishers aren’t doing as much as they used to with regards to publicity and promotion and it falls to authors to fill in the gap. I get that the more reviews a book has, the more likely it is to pop up on users’ pages while they browse Amazon and Barnes & Noble. I even get that the first week of sales is incredibly important when it comes to contract negotiations and future publications. I get all this.

But this still feels wrong to me. It’s using the unpaid labor of fans to move product. I do not love anything enough to stick a giant magnet on the side of my car advertising it for free. It’s using readers’ passion for the books and their desire to have a personal connection with the author to make money and I find that deeply disturbing.

Also, the idea of having a special cadre of “cheerleaders” who do things like have the car magnet and hand out bookmarks and compete to win prizes just makes my skin crawl, especially since there seems to be an audition process (seriously: look at how much unpaid work the head “cheerleaders” have done in past years). What a genius way to find out who your biggest fans are and then to get them to work for you for free. Because, yo, those prizes are totally a tax write-off in the United States (schedule C deduction for supplies) so they are a dollar for dollar reduction of self-employment liability and federal income tax (thanks to my awesome accountant for the wording!).

Other things I find disturbing: the implicit threat in the repeated mentions of how many thousands of people want to participate in this program (so if you don’t follow through or maybe say something unappreciated, you don’t get invited back?), the way they don’t even suggest that folks posting reviews disclose they received the book for free in exchange for the review, the idea that professional reviewers and bloggers aren’t “real” readers, and finally the pooh-poohing of concerns in the comment section about how the reviews at Amazon and Barnes & Noble are already so polluted that what’s a little bit more pollution for readers to wade through. How does contributing more noise do anything but obscure the signal even more? Meoskop has a lot more to say about this signal-noise ratio, in fact.

Excellent tweeps helped me clarify my thinking on this–many thanks to you! I knew something felt hinky, but until I had some folks to talk about this with, I wasn’t sure what that something was. Twitter is the best!

Flail!

I have no idea who this is, but this was seriously me after I went and looked to see what the heck Susan Mallery’s Fool’s Gold series was about. (via)

Linkspam, 2/15/13 Edition

Highlander watering some flowers which he has planted outside his dug-out

Highlander watering some flowers which he has planted outside his dug-out

Linkspam, 1/25/13 Edition

Back to the Good Fortune Diner, Vicki Essex

Back to the Good Fortune Diner, Vicki Essex

Back to the Good Fortune Diner, Vicki Essex

This is part of the book club discussion being hosted over at Something More–consequently, this post is full of spoilers!

Before I say anything else, I want to say that I am so very glad that Vicki Essex’s Back to the Good Fortune Diner exists. There aren’t enough WoC female protagonists in mainstream romance and I suspect that there aren’t many interracial relationships either. I’m still very new to contemporary romance and categories in particular so I could be very wrong about this!

This book has a lot to recommend it–the prose is easy to read and Essex’s voice is very good. Tiffany and Chris are sharply and consistently characterized as are all the secondary characters. There’s a large supporting cast in this book, but I never felt lost or confused. Tiffany’s internal monologue is especially good.

The basic story is that Tiffany loses her job in publishing and after getting evicted from her apartment, comes back to the small town where her parents own a Chinese restaurant and where she grew up. There, she re-encounters one of her former tutoring clients and he hires her to help his teenage son through summer school. During the course of this, Tiffany and Chris re-connect and fall in love–although Tiffany appears to be so prickly and standoffish that I wasn’t always sure why Chris interested in her.

There were some continuity problems–Chris’s dad lost his leg in a farming accident and his high school sweetheart got pregnant (after begging him to have sex with her once without a condom) and I never could figure out which of these things was the real reason Chris dropped out of school–well, they’re both real reasons, but which one was the true trigger? If it had just been one or the other, would he have still come home? Or would he have stayed in school?

I also had a hard time buying Tiffany’s life in NYC–she has a cockroach infested apartment in over a restaurant in Chinatown that she gets evicted from but she was able to afford to keep her car (my understanding that parking in the city can be equivalent to rent on an apartment)? And I had an even harder time buying into her fiscal irresponsibility. It seemed very out of character for her to be that deeply in debt and it felt like a plot device for her to need to get a job as quickly as possible after returning to Everville.  It’s barely mentioned except when it comes to her taking her clothing to the consignment shop and as a reason for her to take on the tutoring job with Simon.

Additionally, I felt like the reason that the Cheungs moved to Everville to be a bit contrived and, dare I say it, a bit Spider-Man-ish. I understand their desire to move out of the city, but for Tiffany’s father to give up what I expect was a relatively lucrative engineering job for a Chinese restaurant? I know a lot of immigrants end up working outside the fields in which they’ve been educated, but this didn’t feel like that kind of decision at all.

Chris’s father is an unvarnished racist and I really liked the way the text didn’t pull any punches with that. I did not, however, believe his change of heart after Tiffany finally calls him on it. It really didn’t work for me–what would have worked would have been William resolving to change his ways and still screwing up and Tiffany continuing to call him on it. Changing that kind of thinking is an ongoing process and no one is perfect.

I also really disliked Tiffany’s parents–they are fighting constantly and at one point Tiffany’s brother, Daniel, describes being beat with a piece of bamboo until Tiffany screamed. It just felt really unhealthy and borderline abusive. I know that Chinese cultural norms around the family can be very different from North American ones but even this felt like it was too, too much.

This last specific complaint refers to something that was mentioned once but it really upset me and left a bad taste in my mouth–early in the book, Tiffany is talking about what a rebel Chris was even though he was quarterback of the football team. One thing she cites as evidence of his rebelliousness is his attitude towards the “obesity epidemic”. First of all, assuming that this book takes place in 2012/13 and that they were in high school 14 years ago (about Simon’s age), that would have been 1998. That’s the year that the BMI guidelines were changed in the US and a lot of people who hadn’t been fat before suddenly became fat. In other words, there was no obesity epidemic when Chris was the quarterback of the football team. And since when is hating fat people rebellious? Last time I checked, it was pretty fucking mainstream and has been for years.

And finally, it bothered me that Tiffany had to realize that her dream job sucked in order for there to be a HEA. Chris doesn’t have to make any changes in his life and Tiffany’s brother is able to do what he wants and still get to try for a relationship with his internet girlfriend but Tiffany has to give up her dreams? It really made me think about a conversation I observed on Twitter between @MaryAnnVadnais and @Miss_Shelley_H on the conservatizing influence of the small town in romance. Tiffany’s world is made smaller and safer by her decision to give up on her dream and that made me really, really sad for her.